The Domain Roundtable; Fostering Entrepreneurs.
May 12th, 2008
By Chuck Kisselburg
I recently attended the Domain Roundtable conference. As with my attendance last year I walked away impressed with the entrepreneurial spirit of people coming together to constructively define and grow an entire industry. With last year’s attendance of the conference I approached the conference expecting to see the wild west of the Internet. What I found was basically no difference in working with general entrepreneurs.
The key word I heard over and over was, “Development”. “Development, Development, Development!”
Parking of domain names, while a way for domainers to monetize their domains, is not necessarily the best use of domains because:
1). Visitors are not receiving that much value from a “traditionally” parked page.
2). Visitors are recognizing a “traditional” parked page and thus getting more irritated and seeing less value.
3). Development means more than simply parking a page.
As stated by Dan Warner, “Something that is rare AND valuable equals sustainable”
The basic principles of domain development include:
1). Obtaining unique and “clean” assets of domains.
2). Provide content that is original.
3). Develop community around your respective domain.
Development means finding a way to provide better, more relevant content that brings value to the visitor. Value means creating something where visitors to a particular domain will want to return. Return means value and value means return. So whether that is development through continually working to find a continual means for providing “relevant” content or developing partnerships with other organizations that may benefit the visitor, suddenly the definition of “development” looks like the more traditional forms of an entrepreneur developing and growing their business.
One of the speakers at the conference was Matt Cutts of Google. Matt’s basic recommendations to the Domainer community were:
1). If a user lands on a page, will that user be happy? Does the page match the topic the user was expecting? Is the content for the visitor relevant?
2). How much unique content might there be when compared with other sites? In other words, is your content stale or is it constantly being updated?
3). Bottom line, for the visitor, does your site add value and is the content unique?
Another speaker at the conference was Gary Kremen. Gary may be most notable to some through his ownership, and subsequent legal battles over sex.com. However, Gary also took one of his domain names, “Match.com” and developed this into a complete business. The basic nuggets of information I took from Gary’s talk were:
1). Is there a business that can be created using a domain that is more than the domain name it was built upon? From my perspective, Match.com is a classic example of this.
2). Are you creating other intellectual property along the way as you develop your domain name(s)?
3). Think about how this business will solve a problem and use this to develop your business plan.
Gary added another element to his discussion that I had never heard before at other domain conferences I had attended and that was “VCs” – Venture Capitalists. This gets into the whole discussion of should you continue to bootstrap what you are doing or does the next step of development require having an outside investment strategy and how outside investment can affect the company you are developing.
While I have the extreme benefit of talking with people across the entire ICANN “community”, I hear peoples’ perspective on what they think of ALL “domainers”. However, when attending a Domain Roundtable conference where speakers come from outside of the “traditional” sense of the Domainer community, I continue to respect the fact that:
1). An industry has formed with little guidance or direction.
2). This industry is trying to provide its own guidance for the betterment of the industry.
3). This industry is more than simply acquiring domain names, sitting on them and later selling them for a profit.
If a Domainer is to be successful, it is simple:
1). Have a “clean” domain portfolio that does not infringe on any trademarks.
2). Trademark your domain.
3). Develop your domain so that what is developed brings value to the visitor, both through adding value and uniqueness of content.
4). Develop your domain such that it solves a problem for visitors to your site.
5). Develop your domain so that you are creating intellectual property along the way.
As such it is my personal opinion to see more of the traditional organizations starting to diversify their portfolios through acquiring their own domain portfolios.
As for the conference itself, it was held to coincide with the AdTech conference. Smart move as several who attended did so because they were able to bundle this in with their trip to AdTech. Another new thing for this conference was the addition of daily passes. While attendance at the conference “appeared” light I ran into numerous attendees who took advantage of purchasing a daily pass so as to attend what was of interest to them. So while the conference as a whole did not seem to have the normal crowd, the “crowd” was there, only more strategic.
Entry Filed under: Site News, TLDs, domaining, Business Strategy, Parking, Registrars
2 Comments Add your own
1. Stephen Douglas | July 28th, 2008 at 8:47 am
Your assessment of the domain industry crowd, or “DOT’s” (Domain Owner Types), is spot on, Chuck.
We are always looking to legitamize domain names, whether that is to resale them to endusers, park them to see what internet users are recognizing the domain terms as essential prodserv terms, or developing them, which we call “buildouts”.
I can’t speak about the DRT 2008, although I produced the DRT 2007. However, I can say that DOT’s are mostly not “pirates, crooks, cybersquatters” but people who believe in this “new media” product - Domain Names. It’s proven that domain names are valuable for direct navigation and branding. It’s up to the public and business sector to understand it.
The most important effort for the domain industry, as I’ve said for over two years now, is to form a coalition of industry experts and companies to set forth a public relations marketing plan, (I advise going through the ICA) and place TV and magazine ads in business mags and late night infocommercials to talk about the realities of owning domain names — across the many ranges of uses of these domain names. There are are a variety of factors for domain name usage, and each has to be explained clearly, and every marketing director and business owner MUST understand this to succeed with their business online.
This must be the goal of domainers now, beyond their own personal domain monetization efforts, because that monetization effort won’t mean diddly squat if the rest of the world doesn’t understand what we know.
Nice article, Chuck.
2. Chuck Kisselburg | July 28th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
Stephen,
I appreciate your comments!
Yes, there is no doubt that domaining has turned into a huge industry. It amazes me to see just how large this industry has become!
Based on what I have been hearing, however, it appears that much of the ROI a domainer receives is through parking their domains. True, the majority of parked pages may result in revenue that basically covers the cost of a domain’s respective annual registration fee. However, in listening to trends in the various sessions, the best way to obtain funding through parked pages is based upon ranking within search engines. If search engines are looking at placing a lower value (rank-wise) on purely parked pages, and placing a higher value on sites that change, provide value for the end user to where the end user comes back, then this form of “buildout” seems to be the trend for domainers to follow. Parking companies may be able to assist domainers with this next level of “buildout”.
With that said, there are many in the Domainer community who are doing just that and I can see where others will follow.
With domains that are “builtout”, to what ever degree, that are beneficial to people who land on those sites, they will, and, in my opinion, should carry greater value. This is where I see the larger corporations getting more interested in acquiring/expanding their own portfolios as they will see such “buildouts” can only increase their visibility in the world. Also, with corporate backing, what value can they bring to the global Internet community with their “buildout” potential? While initially it may be a greater expense for such corporations, I see it as a way of diversifying, thus maintaining a healthier financial base for such corporations while at the same time creating a more robust information and/or retail market for users of the Internet.
Also, if domainers properly develop or build out their sites, then corporations purchasing such domain names, or sites, are seen more like a business acquisition instead of purchasing domains. After all, when dealing with developed domains, you really are dealing with a business. With that said I sense businesses understand the concept/value of business acquisition more so than domain acquisition.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed