<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domainer Industry Alive and Thriving at T.R.A.F.F.I.C.</title>
	<link>http://icannblog.org/2007/10/17/domainer-industry-alive-and-thriving-at-traffic/</link>
	<description>The opinionated blogging arm of ICANNwiki</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: The ICANNblog &#187; Trippin&#8221;'&#8217; Through The Senate Bill 2661 Mine Field.</title>
		<link>http://icannblog.org/2007/10/17/domainer-industry-alive-and-thriving-at-traffic/#comment-5969</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://icannblog.org/2007/10/17/domainer-industry-alive-and-thriving-at-traffic/#comment-5969</guid>
					<description>[...] First of all, some people look at domainers as living in the â€œWild Westâ€ , heading out on their own without boundaries and being reckless. After attending various domainer conferences I know that image is false. However, I canâ€™t help but apply that â€œWild Westâ€ description to this bill. Keep in mind ICANNWiki.org is neutral and listens to the entire ICANN â€œcommunityâ€, but in reading this bill the recklessness, for lack of a better term, is fairly obvious. Is Snoweâ€™s office reaching out and working in concert with the community to try and curb phishing activity? Is Snoweâ€™s office working with ICANN or are they off and running on their own? Is Snoweâ€™s office working directly with the Internet Commerce Association? Or is Snoweâ€™s office running on their own? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] First of all, some people look at domainers as living in the â€œWild Westâ€ , heading out on their own without boundaries and being reckless. After attending various domainer conferences I know that image is false. However, I canâ€™t help but apply that â€œWild Westâ€ description to this bill. Keep in mind ICANNWiki.org is neutral and listens to the entire ICANN â€œcommunityâ€, but in reading this bill the recklessness, for lack of a better term, is fairly obvious. Is Snoweâ€™s office reaching out and working in concert with the community to try and curb phishing activity? Is Snoweâ€™s office working with ICANN or are they off and running on their own? Is Snoweâ€™s office working directly with the Internet Commerce Association? Or is Snoweâ€™s office running on their own? [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
